SovGuardAI analyzes documents, text, and images for language, phrases, and legal theories that have been labeled sovereign citizen ideology by peer-reviewed research and by the American court system. Every detection tactic in the system is drawn from a researcher-maintained taxonomy. Every citation in a report is drawn from a fixed, verified reference set. No citations are generated by AI.
Bottom line: The resulting analysis maps a document against the tactics and language patterns courts have already ruled on, and cites those decisions. If you're a clerk, prosecutor, judge, or researcher, this analysis gives you exactly what you need: clear mapping of tactics + reassurance that courts have a well-established toolkit for rejecting them.
Full Explanation of SovGuardAIDesigned by Dr. C.M. Sarteschi, the national leading researcher in sovereign citizen ideology
Considered the national leading expert on sovereign citizen ideology. She is the author of two key books on sovereign citizens: Sovereign Citizens: A Psychological and Criminological Analysis (2020) and Sovereign Citizen Ideology: Spotlight on the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol (2026).
Sarteschi is a recognized expert frequently sought by media outlets for commentary on extremism, violence, and related topics. Her work and insights have been featured in or quoted by major outlets including The Associated Press, Rolling Stone, USA Today, The Daily Beast, BBC, CBC, ABC (Australia), Newsweek, The Boston Globe, and others. She has also appeared in documentaries, podcasts, and webinars (such as with the George Washington University Program on Extremism) and contributed op-eds to publications like MedPage Today and Just Security. Consistently and continually referenced in academic, legal, and law enforcement contexts worldwide.
Click Below to Watch How SovguardAI Works
A 60-second brief, a correspondence score, a report of flagged phrases, of tactics detected, and previous court rejection language.
All reported material is readily discernable by the non-attorney, yet all reports are attorney ready. If it is necessary to address the court, all reports must be edited and reviewed by a licensed attorney.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABOUT THE TOOL
SCORING & ACCURACY
DOCUMENTS & PRIVACY
PRICING & ACCESS
Courts have made clear they do not wish to receive purely AI-generated submissions. All SovGuardAI output must be evaluated, rewritten, and submitted by a licensed human attorney.
SovGuardAI provides the research foundation—the user/attorney makes the judgments.
Know what you're dealing with in minutes, not hours.